Come See me in the Good Light

It’s strange – when you come to know the work of an artist where it feels as though you might actually know them (we don’t, of course – it just feels that way) – but then you come to the moment where you realize there’s nothing new left of theirs for you to consume – and there never will be.

I’ve written several times about poet Andrea Gibson – talking about them during National Poetry Month and writing up short reviews of their collections and picking one of their books as a First Friday Recommendation. Writing about their death was a difficult one. But at that moment, I knew there was still something new that I had yet to experience. Well, two somethings.

The first was the documentary Come See Me in the Good Light:

I knew about it first from Gibson, who was open early on (as they were with most things in their life) with all of us about what they were going through – with their cancer diagnosis and this film. When they finished and traveled with it, I had considered making a trek to see it because I knew this would likely be the last opportunity I’d have to see them in person. (By then, they had shared with us that their cancer was now labeled incurable.) Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to (which makes me cherish all the times I’ve seen them perform and the instances I’ve been able to interact with them even more).

Thankfully, in April, they announced that AppleTV would be distributing the documentary, which won the Festival Favorite Award at the 2025 Sundance Film Festival, and eventually, Nov 14 was listed as the release date. That’s today – the day I’m writing this (though not the date I’m posting it because today’s blog post already went live – plus, I hadn’t intended to write about this). Even knowing Gibson as I did, and knowing their work, I was ready to be blown away (but no pressure to the film makers, of course) – and I hit play.

And then it hit me.

This was it. This would be the last new thing from my favorite poet that I would ever get to consume – for the first time. Much as I wanted to press stop, to leave it as something new of theirs I had yet to experience, I couldn’t. So I watched, and I laughed, and I cried. Yep. I cried. A lot. Not because Gibson had cancer (and had since died) but because they maintained their humor and their beautiful spirit, and they turned their documentary about life with cancer into a love story – the love they have for their partner, the love they have for their fans, and the love they have for life.

Even if you have never heard of Andrea Gibson before, I implore you to watch. (If you’re not sure yet, check out the trailer.) As Sara Bareilles put it in Variety: “Andrea knew that this film was gonna hold a lot of heavy material, but it’s so funny. You watch this film and Andrea is hysterical, hysterically funny, as is Meg. So you’re laughing a lot, and it’s just a joyful, life-affirming film that happens to be about cancer.”

Megan [reading to Gibson from her memoir]: Cancer care proved to be octopoidal. My phone–
Andrea: Octopoidal? Megan: Yeah.
Andrea: What the fuck is that? Megan: What does it sound like?
Andrea: I have no fucking clue what that means, Meg. That one’s too much, I’m sorty.

If you were paying attention, you might be asking – what’s the second thing?

My artsy worlds collided when one of my favorite singers (Sara B) found Gibson’s work. In that same Variety article quoted above, she says, “I got introduced to Andrea’s work on Instagram…It was all of those videos they would share, and I was just so moved by their generosity and courage to share something so intimate, and with so much lightness. I think that’s one of Andrea’s superpowers, this ability to hold the dark matter with so much light and real love…There’s a lot of really incredible wisdom in their perspective.”

Sara B eventually met Gibson (saw them perform) and got involved in the film by way of producing. And then got to take it one step further. The team was looking for something to end the film with, to roll with the credits. Cut to – Sara B taking snippets of Gibson’s unfinished work and, in collaboration with Brandi Carlile, creating a love song out of it. (Yep, she finally wrote someone a love song – and who better than for Gibson?) Never in my life did I expect to experience a collaboration between Gibson and Sara B – but here we are:

Gibson still lives on in the work of their partner, Megan Falley, who has been just as open and generous with her own experience and grief after Gibson’s passing, including this writing about having to grieve her partner alongside Gibson’s other love of their life, their dog Squash (of A Letter to my Dog fame), which she wrote about in a post called “Grieving Andrea with the One Who Loved Them Longest.” I highly recommend listening to the poem and then reading the post.

It is hard to think there will never be another new poem to experience for the first time – but Gibson gave so much in their too-short life, and there’s much to return to.

“I can measure my wellness by this question: Is my attention on loving, or is my attention on who isn’t loving me?”
~ Andrea Gibson, You’d Better Be LIghtning

300th

It’s weird for me to consider that I am currently writing my three hundredth post on this blog. Partly because Dec 16, 2017 feels like a REALLY long time ago (the date of my first post). But also, that means that I have been consistently posting here every Friday for almost EIGHT YEARS? I’m sorry. What?

When I started this blog, it was in response to ‘advice’ out in the world that having a presence online was important for new authors – and at that point, that meant the face app, the photo app, the bird app, and having an established blog. Since then, ‘blogs’ as we knew them (part of someone’s website) aren’t much of a thing anymore. Posts have become part of social media, and there are any number of platforms that one can post in the hopes of gaining a following (and, in some cases, a paycheck). And here I am, still typing along on my website to… likely no one. Why?

Because I can, and it’s a habit that I like. It forces me to write about things I likely wouldn’t otherwise – because you have to come up with an idea to write about in the post, and then repeat every week until…well, who knows how long. I’m a little surprised I made it eight years, to be honest. But here we are.

A lot has happened since that first post. I finished my first ever novel-length manuscript, revised my little heart out, found some incredible beta readers, revised more, queried, and even signed a contract with a publisher to put that story out into the world. I’ve written three and half other manuscripts. (Two are out in the world – Wherever Would I Be and Goode vs Melville. One is waiting for it’s first revision phrase. One is waiting for me to figure out where I want to take it.) I started research on a new novel that has been pushing itself forward.

I’ve also continued to teach (hello year seventeen?!?!), and I joined three book clubs. I’ve been to Scotland twice and am plotting to move there someday. I attempted to drive Route 66, but after the fourth tornado, I turned around. I also lost my favorite two fuzzy writing buddies.

The world shut down and reopened a changed place.

And I continue to type. I’m Ami Maxine, by the way. It’s nice to meet you. See you on post 301.

Al Falling Things: Back Blurb

I want to be clear – writing an 80,000 word novel is not an easy thing. (No, I’m not one of those writers who hates the act of writing, and not I’m not about to lament how difficult the process of novel writing it – I flippin’ love it. What I hate is that I don’t have more time to do it. Or a comfier chair to do sit in while I write…I really should get on that.)

The thing that no one told me is that the further into the writing/publication process you get, the fewer words you get.

First up – write a query package. Write out the entire synopsis of the plot of your 80K novel in one page. (Or two pages. Or a thousand words. Length all depends on the agent you are querying.) I mean, it took you 80K the first time – and by now, you have fallen in love with all your side characters and can’t possibly leave any of them out of the synopsis! So you write and you slash and you slash some more and you wrangle that 80K story into a single page.

Then you have to write the query letter – where you get maybe 250 words to explain the arc, make the agent fall in love with it, and end on a cliffhanger that makes them want to read more.

You’d think that would be enough torture. But then there’s the back blurb – something to entice a myriad of readers, not just this single agent that you have researched and know what they are looking for and can therefore tailor the letter to them. This now had to be something so specific to your story but open enough not to make your audience too niche – and it all needs to fit on the back of the book.

But wait – that’s not all. You still have the logline. Yes – one sentence to sum up an entire 80K story that’s intriguing enough to get them to even read the back blurb, which is in turn hopefully interesting enough to get them to read the book.

But no pressure, right?

Well, my book finally has a logline and a back blurb that I get to share with you. 🙂

All Falling Things by Ami Maxine Irmen

Finding your way means sometimes getting lost…

She left her perfect life behind. He’s trapped in one he never wanted.

When their worlds collide on a Chicago sidewalk, both will discover that falling apart might be the only way to become whole again.

Alice Hart has always done what was expected—steady job, steady man, steady future. Until one impulsive decision sends her two thousand miles from home, armed with nothing but two suitcases and a stubborn hope that life can be more than “fine.”

Stanley Hoppenworth has the corner office, the tailored suit, and the hollow ache of a man living someone else’s dream. The last thing he needs is a distraction—especially one with blue eyes, wind-tangled hair, and a habit of asking dangerous questions about happiness.

As their chance encounter turns into something real, Alice and Stanley must choose between the safety of who they were and the risk of who they could become. Because love doesn’t just catch you when you fall—it shows you how to land.

Now I need to figure out the ten-second pitch for when it’s time to sell the thing…

First Friday Rec: How to Be Perfect

Title: How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question
Author: Michael Schur
Genre: Nonfiction, Philosophy, Humorous
Pages: 304
Publication Date: 18 Apr 2023
StoryGraph* Moods:
How I Stumbled Upon This Book: I’m a fan of his shows The Good Place and Brooklyn Nine-Nine. When he was interviewed on a podcast (can’t remember if it was Armchair Expert or Smartless – maybe both), he mentioned his book was coming out, so I had to give a shot.
Other Books by this author: None at the time of writing this.
*StoryGraph also offers content warnings.

Description: From Bookshop.org: “Schur starts off with easy ethical questions like “Should I punch my friend in the face for no reason?” (No.) and works his way up to the most complex moral issues we all face. Such as: Can I still enjoy great art if it was created by terrible people? How much money should I give to charity? Why bother being good at all when there are no consequences for being bad? And much more. By the time the book is done, we’ll know exactly how to act in every conceivable situation, so as to produce a verifiably maximal amount of moral good. We will be perfect, and all our friends will be jealous. OK, not quite. Instead, we’ll gain fresh, funny, inspiring wisdom on the toughest issues we face every day.”

Why I recommend this book: Maybe you hear ‘philosophy’ and think, nope – no way. No thank you, next. Or you hear comedy and think ‘How dare he? Philosophy is not a joke!’ Well, I say to both – give it a shot. Yes, Schur approaches philosophical questions with a humorous bent, but I promise this does nothing more than make the conversation accessible. He cares about the content – the humor is a tool to make it palatable, not as something used to make fun of philosophy.

It’s a quick and fun read – a good entry into a topic that can sometimes get overly confusing and convoluted.

“The complete freedom that existentialists shove down our throats – the insistence that we can’t defend our choices using any external structure – keeps us from using those structures as a crutch. …we’re tempted to look for something solid to hand onto, a reason that justifies what we’re going to do as though that were really the only possible choice. Reasons make us feel better because the reframe our choices as inevitable, this absolving of responsibility.”
~ Michael Schur, How to Be Perfect

It’s Halloweeeeen!

I’m gonna be real honest – I don’t do horror.

Because I can’t.

Call me a wuss – I’m fine with that. I call it having too vivid of an imagination. The things that I read and watch tend to show up in my dreams – probably because of the way I consume things, thinking about how they are constructed and how they are choosing to tell the story and a whole string of ‘what ifs.’ It’s no surprise, then, that as I continue to process it throughout the day, my subconscious needs to find ways to file it all away while I’m sleeping. Enter: dreams.

So if the thing I’m reading is gory or scary, so are my dreams. Which means I don’t sleep well.

There is a part of me that wishes it could read and watch horror because of how excited folks who consume it get when they talk about it. But the rest of me points at all the other books out in the world that are there for the reading – and I can’t help but wonder if my subconscious did me a favor by cutting out this particular genre.

(In September, one of my book clubs read a series of essays where people talk about why the horror genre was so important to them, and each essay was based around a particular movie that means a lot to them. I had seen maybe two? People were shocked that I hadn’t even seen Jaws – I mean, who hasn’t? Well. I hadn’t. <–and no, that’s not a typo. After I stated that I was ok never seeing any of the movies talked about in that collection, and that I would be skipping our October meeting when we were set to read an actual horror novel, my friend and I opted to head to the drive in near us. It’s their 75th season, and they were opting to show a couple throw backs – ET (which her boys had yet to see) and, yep, Jaws. Happy to say I managed to sit through it, but also happy to never see it again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

The Archives

I’ve definitely made clear over the years my love and appreciation for libraries and how librarians are clearly magicians in disguise. Libraries have given me decades of adventures at the tips of my fingers. First, the GIANT (though I didn’t know what I had when I lived there) library of my childhood. Then, the tiny one-room library of my teens (the children’s section of my first library easily dwarfed the entirety of the second one) (thankfully, all the libraries in the county were connected, so if ours didn’t have what we were looking for, the others might). Next came the libraries of my colleges, which I know I didn’t utilize nearly as much as I should have.

Currently, I bounce back between my county library and the one at the college where I work. Though I recently added another – the university library where I live. (In case you didn’t know, most colleges and universities allow community members to hold cards, though there may be some restrictions to it.) Specifically, a part of the library I’ve never utilized – the archives.

Yes, libraries are great places to check out books or use the internet or attend fun programs or join a summer reading challenge. They are also a place that conserves history, generally local history.

After rewatching The Americans too many times (but what is too many, really?), an idea sparked for a KGB story I wanted to write, and for the first time, I saw it placed in my current city. Yes, I could have hopped online and done a little keyboard research, but I thought better of it for this. I reached out to the university archives director and asked if they had anything about KGB activity in the city.

They did not. BUT! She very kindly pointed out that they had a lot of material that would tell me about the city at the time the story would take place. So far, all of my novels and short stories have been contemporary. This is my first official historical fiction piece, and I wanted to do it right.

I also happen to love a good research rabbit hole. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And here’s the best part: I went in with questions, and she had some really smart ones of her own. This is what she does, after all. So while, yes, G00GLE is right there, it’s only going to give you things that match the questions you can come up with (hopefully good things, but not always) – it won’t know to say, “Hey, have you thought about this?”

Moral of the post? If you’ve ever had a wonder about something local, don’t hop online. Reach out to your local archives. You never know where it might lead you. 🙂

Midterms

I legit don’t know what happened. I blinked – and we’re halfway through the semester already? That old adage is indeed true – time indeed moves faster the older you get. But also the busier you get.

But could it maybe not? 😂👀

Midterms in my field means exams for most – students will take them, and faculty will grade them. For me, it’s merely the midway point. It’s one of the perks of teaching English – we don’t generally have exams. (I did at first, and then thought…why? Your papers should indicate your understanding of the material – though with the advent of AI, maybe those will have to be reintroduced… *shudders*)

So midterms for me means we’re halfway – half the papers have been graded, half the lectures given. Another half to go. And much as I am looking forward to winter break, I’m ok if it takes its time. There is much to do before then.

Films to Be Buried With: Resurrected

If you’ve been reading my blog for a while, you’ll know that I’ve been a fan of Brett Goldstein’s podcast Films to Be Buried With and have taken the opportunity to answer his questions for myself (sometimes with a twist of theater or books instead of films). To round out this “series” of posts, I thought I’d answer his ‘resurrections’ questions. In some instances, he’ll have a guest back where he’ll note “You were dead, but I have brought you back to life because I like you.” So instead of the first question being “How did you die?”, he’ll ask “What point in your life would you come back to? What would you change? What would you keep the same?” And honestly, I’d just come back to now (well, maybe a year ago). There are things I’d like to change about my life, of course, but then I can’t help but think about the good things in my life – and it wouldn’t be worth the risk to not have those things/people. What if I changed something and my best friend is just gone? (One of the guests, Toheeb Jimoh, asked if he kept his memories from now even if he went back earlier, and Goldstein said yes. But even if that weren’t the case, that I’d have different people in my life and maybe they could be ‘better’, I’d still rather have what I have now. Plus, can you imagine if you end up having it worse, but you have the memories of when it was better?)

First question is what’s the last film you saw? — The last film I saw, which is also the last I’ve seen in the theater was Wicked. I had read the book before saw I saw the musical (on tour) which was before I saw the film, so I knew the story pretty intimately. I’ve also seen enough clips of Kristin Chenoweth in the role of Glinda to know how similar Ariana made her own Glinda. I thought the film was well done. (Unpopular opinion – I don’t think we needed to stretch the first film out as long as we did. It’s only five minutes shy of the musical/play…) I do think they did a wonderful job with it, especially knowing some of the things they did practically when they could have absolutely used CGI.

Who do you think should play you in the film of your Life? — First, I don’t think that’s a film anyone would want to see, so why are we making it? Next, I’d want to be completely unreasonable and say someone like Emma Stone because she would make me seem so much cooler than I actually am.

What’s the most romantic film you’ve ever seen? Are you a romantic? — It’s silly, but Sweet November. The film itself was ok – but the notion that she gave up her own chance at happiness, however short lived, so that he could keep a perfect memory – that’s a romantic sacrifice. (But also annoying – like, you are both going to be miserable, and you made that decision for him?) While You Were Sleeping is my other choice. This is a film I could watch a million times over and never get sick of. Who doesn’t love Sandy B? Or Bill Pullman pining over her. Again – he was willing to sacrifice his own happiness so that his brother could be happy and because he thought that’s what she wanted. A+ pining Mr. Pullman.

What is the best film you ever saw that you never want to see again? — Probably The Sixth Sense. It will never again have that “wait, what‽‽” impact again. And they gave away all the details that you would have discovered on a second watch (that montage where you see things like him going to dinner, but his wife getting up to leave as he just sat down and what not). I didn’t need to watch it a second time because they told me everything I’d find on such a watching. They robbed me of the chance to go back and see those things for myself. There’s no need to watch it again.

What is the best action film you’ve ever seen? — The first John Wick. Not that the others aren’t great, but there were some action scenes later on that just felt…too much. Like, he fights his way up this giant staircase, only to tumble down them and have to fight his way back up? But the first, everything was moving the story forward. And it was beautifully filmed. (Again, they all were – but this was the first time where I saw this sort of film shot this way.)

Of all the films in the world, if you had to, which film do you think you could have made? And why? — Anne of Green Gables (I might be cheating because it’s not necessarily a film, but sorta is, but is more a TV mini series). And I wouldn’t want to remake it (in fact, I refuse to watch the remake) because it will never be as good as CBC did it – it is NOT AoGG without Megan Follows or Colleen Dewhurst or Richard Farnswerth. And anyone other than Jonathan Crombie is #NotMyGilbert. I just think if tasked, this would be the story – because I love it so much and would be absolutely true to the book because it’s perfect. But Crombie passed away, so it should never ever be remade.

What film have you pretended to like to impress people? — I honestly don’t pretend to like something to impress people. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Not everything is for everyone. My not enjoying something doesn’t take away from someone else loving it. Just as I don’t fault people who don’t like things that I absolutely love.

What’s the film you’ve never seen that you think it’s mad? — Citizen Kane. But it’s mad because I borrowed it from a colleague YEARS ago, and I still have not seen it. (I mostly want to watch it to see what the fuss is all about.) Maybe I’ll watch it tonight so that I can finally return it. 😛 (NARRATOR: She did not watch it that night.)

What is the film you love that you don’t expect anyone else to like? — I don’t know that I have a specific answer for this one, either – just in general, there are some romcoms that I truly love, and that genre is often shit on as less than. But at the same time, they make a lot of money, so there would be a lot of people that love them, too. I don’t know that I’ve seen anything obscure enough that I wouldn’t know a lot of people that have already seen it and expressed their opinion about it. (Maybe Then She Found Me only because I don’t think a lot of folks ever saw it. I did because Colin Firth is in it, and he’s as adorable as he always is.)

What’s the film you would show a lover as a test to see if you should be together? — Probably Singing in the Rain – because if they can’t sit through an hour and forty-three minute musical, they aren’t going to do well with a partner who likes to blast the showtimes while cleaning the house or randomly bursts out into song for no apparent reason.

What is the film that made you the most uncomfortable? — Any horror film I’ve ever seen. Or any film I saw as a child with one parent or the other that I clearly wasn’t mature enough to be watching, especially with my parent.

If you could show a child one film, what would it be and frankly, what are you doing it forcing a child to watch? — I like to watch films from my childhood with my oldest nephew (the younger one is still quite young, but I’m sure I’ll enjoy sharing them with him, as well). So he’s already seen a number of the ones I’ve wanted to share. I think something like All Dogs Go to Heaven or The Land Before Time would be a nice experience to share with him. I mean, who doesn’t bond over devastating stories? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

At the end of the podcast, Goldstein allows the person to live – but makes it clear that they may die again in his presence on a future episode. So if that day were to arise, what is the one DVD they would leave to someone in their will (and there is only room in the will for one). I took Anne of Green Gables with me last time, but assuming I can get my hands on another copy, I’d, of course, leave that one. Everyone should watch it. Everyone.

First Friday Rec: True Biz

Title: True Biz
Author: Sara Nović
Genre: Fiction, Contemporary, Literary
Pages: 402
Publication Date: 5 Apr 2022
StoryGraph* Moods: Informative, Emotional, Reflective
How I Stumbled Upon This Book: I want to say Instagram, but I can’t remember for sure.
Other Books by this author: Girl at War and America is Immigrants.
*StoryGraph also offers content warnings.

Description: The title of this novel comes from an exclamation in American Sign Language meaning ‘really, seriously, definitely, real-talk.’

The novel follows three people: Charlie – who is deaf but had never met another deaf person before joining River Valley School (nor has she been allowed to learn ASL; she was born to a completely hearing family), Austin – the popular boy whose baby sister is born hearing, and February – the school’s headmistress who is doing what she can to keep the school open (she’s a hearing child of deaf parents).

Charlie finds herself feeling completely behind in deaf culture, made to feel other in a setting she staunchly belongs in. Part coming of age story, part love letter to deaf culture, Nović gives insight to a world most will never get to experience otherwise.

Why I recommend this book: In this story, Nović explores the ways language can include or exclude someone from the conversation (literally and figuratively) and how it can help one to forge an identity.

The formatting of the story is also an interesting read – taking into consideration the difference between dialogue spoken aloud in English and that provided via sign language.

Even if coming of age or finding the self stories aren’t your thing, this is a good read – you’ll learn something.

“But language bears more than the work of communicating with the mainstream world; it is also the internal vehicle for our thoughts and feelings, the mechanism through which we understand ourselves. Without first having had ASL, I would not have understood myself as a person with a story to tell.”
~ Sara Nović, True Biz

NCIS

By the time of this posting, the NCIS universe includes 1,063* episodes of television. In an era where most shows get about thirty episodes total over three seasons (usually with a few years between seasons with viewers waiting in limbo to hear if the show will go on), it’s sort of astounding to consider just how much content this universe encompasses. Even ignoring the spinoffs, the flagship show is about to start its twenty-third season with 489 episodes in its backlog (I’m including the two backdoor pilot episodes from JAG in that number). (For those wondering, Grey’s Anatomy comes in with 448 episodes – 664 if you include spinoffs Private Practice, with 111, and Station 19, with 105.)

I don’t remember when I started watching this show, but I can say that I’ve seen the entire flagship series several times. It’s one of those shows I know well enough that I can have it on in the background while I’m working. (Though I don’t know the post-Gibbs’-stare years all that well. And I miss Ducky something fierce.)

I understand there is quite a team working on this franchise, but the idea of amassing that much work, even over twenty-three years? Feels impossible. (That being said, yes, there are storylines that get repeated in some of the spinoffs, and yes, it is quite disconcerting when a character from the flagship shows up in a spinoff – but as someone else. Like when Melinda McGraw, who plays a formidable character on the flagship, Diane, shows up in New Orleans as bad guy Gina Powell…?) (Also, hard to believe Diane was only in six episodes of NCIS – she had such a presence, it feels like much more.)

Three of the spinoffs are off the air – three more are just getting started:
— Los Angeles (2009-2022, 14 seasons, 323 episodes, not counting back door pilot)
— New Orleans (2014-2020, 7 seasons, 155 episodes, not counting back door pilot)
— Hawai’i (2021-2024, 3 seasons, 54 episodes)
— Sydney (2023 – ?, 18 episodes so far, next season premiers Oct 14)
— Origins (2024 – ?, 18 episodes so far, next season premiers Oct 14)
— Tony & Ziva (2025 – ?, 6 episodes so far, premiered Sep 4)

All but LA can be found streaming on the Paramount app. (I am utilizing my library instead – it’s DVDs, but they at least also have LA.) I’ve yet to watch Origins or Tony & Ziva, but so far, aside from the flagship, I’m really digging LA (they are undercover, and there’s more action). I also think Hawai’i should have lasted more than three seasons. But I’m stoked to see Sydney continue, and Tony & Ziva takes place in Europe. I’m hoping we’ll get to see some more international iterations.

That all said, there is a part of me that feels like the flagship needs to end. (None of the original characters are even on the show anymore; and before you say, but McGee! He wasn’t in the pilot or first several episodes. He first showed up in season one episode seven, then again in episode eleven, and then finally became a regular starting in episode eighteen. At the moment, he is the character with the most episodes recorded, currently clocking in at 472.) I will continue to watch until it ends, but there comes a point where perhaps that’s the only reason?

*1,063 sounds astounding…until I learned that the TV drama with the most episodes is General Hospital clocking in with 15,801 episodes as of this posting. The first episode aired on April 1, 1963 – and it is STILL going (in its sixty-third year). And no, I will not be taking on the task of watching every single episode of that show…

What’s the longest running show you’ve ever watched?