Books to Be Buried With, Part One

Previously, I’ve answered the questions Brett Goldstein poses on his podcast Films to Be Buried With. First, I kept to the premise – movies. Then I answered the questions about TV shows. This time, my answers will all be books.

What was the first-ever book you read? — I don’t know the answer for sure, but I have a copy of Rosie by Cindy Wheeler, a children’s book I checked out of the library so often that my mother eventually bought it for me. I also know I had a fondness for the Clifford the Big Red Dog series, as well as Charlotte’s Web. I read anything and everything as a kid, so it’s hard to know what was first.

What was the book that scared you the most? — I honestly don’t have an answer for this. I don’t read scary books. [strained smile] My dreams are vivid enough without the help.

What was the book that made you cry the most? — I had to keep coming back to this because no one book is coming to mind as making me cry. I don’t often cry while reading, even for sad books. But there are a couple moments in the Anne of Green Gables series that got me to shed a tear or two. The first is when Matthew dies, for which I will never forgive L.M. Montgomery. The second is when Gilbert proposes and she turns him down – I always want to reach through the pages and shake Anne by the shoulders. LET YOURSELF BE HAPPY!

What book is TERRIBLE but you love it? — OK – read the whole response before tar and feathering me – but Outlander. It’s not terrible. I do enjoy reading it – I love the historical fiction and the Scotland of it all (my enthusiasm waned when they landed in the colonies). But it does suffer from what I call the Grey’s Anatomy effect. I remember distinctly while reading the fifth book that I cursed the skies wondering why these people couldn’t even walk through the woods without someone getting bitten by a poisonous snake. 😐 It didn’t feel like it moved the story along – it felt like it was just supposed to mess with my emotions – and I don’t enjoy that.

What is the book you once loved but reading it now you realise it’s terrible?Eat, Pray, Love. I mean no disrespect to Gilbert, who is a phenomenal writer. But. I reread it recently, and it was really hard to ignore the tone and the privilege that is never addressed.

What is the book that means the most to you? Not because of the book it’s self, but because of the memories, you have of it. –Much like my film answer, my book answer is the Anne of Green Gables series by L.M. Montgomery. It reminds me of my nana, makes me feel closer to her since she passed away.

To be continued next week!

GvM – What’s in a name?

For the first time probably ever (at least that I can remember), I had the title first – Goode versus Melville. It would be a superhero story about warring families – heroes versus villains. Get it? (Hey, it’s my first attempt at a pun. All the other puns in the story came from my punny friend, Matt.)

I’m honestly not sure when I named my MC/narrator Antony. I knew he would be Italian. In retrospect, the name fit well – it means worthy of praise, of value. Which is exactly what Antony wishes to strive for – he wants to be good, worthy. (Normally, when I pick a name, I go for meaning first – this was a happy accident.)

My other MC/narrator is Terrell – there are a lot of claims about the meaning of this name, but I honestly just liked the sound of it – Terrell Goode.

Antony’s parents are Finlay and Noemi. Finlay is Scottish origin, and it means ‘fair-haired hero.’ It was mean to be ironic. Noemi means ‘my delight’ – which is exactly how Finlay saw her. She was the light of his world, and he would have done anything for her. Literally. Thus, his path of revenge to avenge what he believes is her murder.

As for Terrell’s parents – his mother is Mekena (means abundance) Okoye (means just) (she’s a modern woman and kept her maiden name), and his father is Alamini (means trustworthy) Goode. They are THE good couple of the city, the leaders in the effort to make their city a better place, to rid Stirling of any bit of villainy.

Naming is one of my favorite things to do when I’m creating characters, getting to know who they are and trying to find something that will fit. It’s rare that I change a name, but that shouldn’t be surprising given how much time I spend up front looking for just the right fit.

The Bookworm Pills

The image below came through my Instagram feed recently, and it caught my attention as a fun writing/reading question. Often, my writing buddy and I talk about our characters as though they are living, breathing people – when you put so much time and energy into something, someone, it’s hard to think of them as only existing on the page sometimes. So what if…

I think I’d take the Life Pill first, bring Kya to life. She’s the best friend of Alice, the MC from my first book. She’s bright and energetic and philosophical – and I think we would have some really fun conversations.

Then I’d take the Body Pill and walk around in Sally Owens’ (from Practical Magic) shoes for a little while – preferably after they have vanquished Jimmy Angelov back to the world of the dead.

Which ones would you choose?

My Life with Donald Duck

When I was a toddler, my parents found a stuffed Donald Duck toy at a garage sale for twenty-five cents. I don’t know the details of the story – if I found it and begged for it, or if they just thought I’d like it. Regardless, it would become my favorite of all my toys. (Which I heard about later in life: “All the toys you ever got, and that twenty-five cent stuffed duck was your favorite.” I have a similar sentiment when I buy my cats toys, and they prefer Q-Tips or a bit of yarn.)

Apparently, it wasn’t long before I infused enough life into that stuffed duck that my family started treating him like he was indeed a living, breathing thing – another member of the family. My mother has a story where she was washing him and couldn’t bring herself to put his head under the water. I also have a series of photos (below) where I was sick, and my parents, in an effort to cheer me up, tucked him in on the couch with his own throw up bucket (a plastic measuring cup) and captured a moment where he was being sick over the toilet bowl.

When we got a dog, I had a stern conversation with him about leaving my duck alone (which apparently worked because he never once went after him). The only time Donald and I were apart was when my dad had to have surgery, and I sent Donald to the hospital with him so that he wouldn’t be lonely. And it was my dream as a child to go to Disney and meet said Duck (something that wouldn’t happen well into adulthood – though I am still holding out for the O.G. sailor Donald).

During my bookstore crawl a few months ago, I stumbled upon a book I’d never seen before – a ‘biography’ of Donald Duck. This was at the vintage shop – the spine was covered in painters tape, and they wanted fifty bucks for it. Me being me, with my love for the cranky duck (the original angry bird, if you will), went home and hopped online. I found a copy on eBay for twelve bucks plus shipping – the hardcover was still in tact, and they even had the dust jacket, which had some wear and tear. I couldn’t resist.

Donald is still hanging around, sitting on a shelf with a couple other treasures from my childhood, like my baby blanket my great-grandmother knitted for me.

TV Shows to Be Buried With, Part Two

Here are the answers to the second six questions Goldstein asks on his podcast. To read the first six, see last week’s post.

What is the sexiest TV Show? Queer as Folk (the 1999-2005 Showtime series). And not just because there is sex in the show (which there is quite a lot – I swear it does calm down from the pilot/first season). But more so because this was a show where folks got to be themselves. It was not a world (like Schitt’s Creek) where homophobia didn’t exist – it did, and it did play into the plot. This show got to be sexy because people were unapologetically themselves – while they evolved and grew. And no matter the content/context, that is a sexy thing.

Which TV Show do you most relate to? — I spent a lot of time on this question, and I think I’ve landed on Superstore. I spent a good chunk of my life working customer service jobs (in a tourist area, ugh), so I can relate to a lot of issues and can recognize a lot of the customers these characters encounter. I also relate to the notion of work friends – how you can lift each other up and make even a shitty job bearable.

Which TV Show is objectively the greatest ever?The Americans. Matthew Rhys. Keri Russel. Do I need to say more? The acting is superb. The plot ripe with tension. It’s a show about family, about marriage. It’s about friendship. All with the backdrop of the Cold War during the 1980s – because, if you didn’t know, Rhys and Russel play KGB spies (THIS is how you thwart expectations with the tiny blonde woman who can kick @$$). The intricacies and complications of developing and maintaining spies, of planning missions and questioning orders – even rewatching it and knowing what’s coming, the tension persists. It’s SO good.

I have to give a second answer, which is Ted Lasso. I initially had no interest in watching it because I know nothing about soccer (due to not really have access to it as a kid, either playing or watching). But a friend thankfully encouraged me to watch, and I was HOOKED after the first episode. It’s so much more than soccer. It’s about friendship and becoming the best version of yourself and mental health and just life. The story is character-driven (which I LOVE). I know there was a lot of hate for the series finale, and while some storylines didn’t wrap up how I would have liked them, I still thought it was great and satisfying. If you’ve neglected watching thus far because you don’t care about soccer, just watch it. Trust me.

And for a third answer because I just can’t choose – The West Wing. Sorkin is just such a great writer, and the actors are all superb. I wasn’t able to watch this when it aired live, but I have seen it so many times thanks to streaming services. It never gets old.

Which TV Show is the one you’ve watched the most? Will & Grace. Gilmore Girls. NCIS. White Collar. Rizzoli & Isles. Bones. Lucifer. (I have a thing for detective procedurals.) The Good Place. Schitt’s Creek. Ted Lasso. I like noise when I work, so there are shows that I’ll play over and over because I don’t need to watch closely. When I need a moment away from grading, I’ll tune in to the show. Because I’ve seen it enough times, I can just jump in and out of the plot.

What’s the worst TV Show you’ve ever seen? — Like I said last week, if I find a show to be terrible, I tend to turn it off after a couple episodes. I guess I can say that I have a love/hate relationship with Grey’s Anatomy. I got hooked early on with the original group of interns, but after a while, I had to stop watching because it just became too far fetched with the number of things they put those characters through. I actually stopped watching after Derek died. Not because he died, but because you knew going in he would die, and the episode was just an entire hour of playing with our emotions – back to back to back incidents that all almost killed him but didn’t. It felt more for ratings than for the sake of storytelling. I’ve caught up and stopped watching and caught up and stopped watching a few times now. I have a similar relationship with NCIS, though not quite as extreme. Just a feeling that both of these shows need to end already. I’m watching only because I have invested so much of my life to them both.

What is the TV Show that’s literally made you laugh out loud the most?Ted Lasso. There are so many one-liners that catch me off guard, even on a rewatch. There are also so many gut-wrenching moments, but they all balance out so well. Also love to laugh during The Good Place, Superstore, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Schitt’s Creek, The Big Bang Theory, Will & Grace. I hate that The Chair didn’t get another season.

At the end of the podcast, Goldstein tells his guest that there is only enough room in the casket to take one film with them into the afterlife – so which one would they take? This is a hard one for this TV show version – there are so many I wish I could take. I think I would have to flip a coin and either take The Americans or The West Wing.

TV Shows to Be Buried With, Part One

When I did the original blog posts about Brett Goldstein’s podcast Films to Be Buried With, I kept thinking – if I could include a TV show, this category would be SO much easier to respond to (looking at you, ‘most relatable’ question). So I thought, why not answer the same questions with TV shows?

What was the first-ever TV show you saw? — Similar to my film answer, I don’t honestly remember what TV show came first. We had one TV in the house, and Dad ruled the remote. I remember WKRP in Cincinnati, which I obviously saw in reruns, and the original Night Court. We watched a lot of PBS, especially cooking shows – reruns of The French Chef with Julia Child and The Frugal Gourmet with Jeff Smith (who my sister wrote a letter to wishing him well after he had a heart attack – and he responded). As a TV show that I watched because it was something I was interested in, I think Doogie Howser, M.D. was the first. (Also my first in a far-too-long line of celebrity crushes on men who turned out to be gay.) I sat down recently to rewatch this with my nephew and sister, and we turned it off rather quickly – and then questioned our parents letting us watch it at that age. 😜

What was the TV show that made you cry the most? — I don’t know if I have a “made me cry the most” show – but more so moments I can remember crying during various TV shows. Like when Craig T. Nelson’s character died on Parenthood. Or when David and Patrick get married on Schitt’s Creek. Or, you know, This is Us. It takes a lot for a show to bump me over the ‘choked up’ line into ‘pass the Kleenex’ territory.

What TV show is TERRIBLE but you love it? — I honestly don’t think I have an answer for this one. If a show is terrible, I usually can’t get through more than the first couple of episodes. I say this with the full realization that I had trouble getting through the first couple episodes of Schitt’s Creek, but I eventually did (due to encouragement from a friend), and it’s one of my favorite shows. So I’m sure some of the others I once thought terrible perhaps aren’t – I just hadn’t given them enough time.

What is the TV show you once loved but watching it now you realise it’s terrible? — I’m sure I’ll get tarred and feathered for this, but Friends. I hadn’t started watching it when it first came on, but rather, I dated someone in college who loved the show, and I did get hooked. It became one that I could play in the background while I worked. I was without it for some time, and then it was on Netflix for a bit. And my goodness… The misogyny. The fat jokes. The way the men are not really friends with the women – but mostly just want to get laid by them. The older I get, the more I realize that these characters are actually terrible people. (Don’t come at me. You go ahead and keep watching it.) I’d have the same sentiment regarding Gilmore Girls (again, no tar and feathers, please). I loved this show when it first came out – I wanted to be Rory and have a mom like Lorelai. But the older I get, the more I realize how much toxicity there actually was in that relationship. (And the reboot…)

What is the TV show that means the most to you? Not because of the TV show itself, but because of the memories, you have of it. — Will & Grace. And yes, I realize after my last answer that some folks are going to be like – really??? There are definitely aspects of this show that haven’t aged the best. But this show, for a girl in a small town pre-internet whose best friend just came out to her, was my ONLY connection to the gay world. Cut to twenty years later, and I got to sit in the audience for the reboot with one of my dearest friends. I got see where the magic was made. I got to exist in the same room as these characters that had meant so much to me. I’m not sure any show can ever replace that feeling.

To be continued next week!

Casting for GvM

Today was supposed to be my writing day. I’ve managed to write a couple more lines, but it’s just not happening. [sigh] So I thought I’d instead share the casting I’ve done for for my third novel, Goode versus Melville (which I abbreviate to GvM).. I give you the characters of Goode Versus Melville:

Meet Antony Goode – the intended narrator of this story. Originally, it was to be told entirely in his first person point of view. He is the son of a villain, and his mother died shortly after his birth. He likes to build things, likes to figure out how things work – which his father finds useful. The thing his dad doesn’t know is that Antony doesn’t want to be evil – he wants to be good – he wants to make the world a better place. He’s also falling in love with the son of his father’s nemesis.

And yeah, Tom Holland seems the perfect mix of charming and self-aware and innocent to pull this particular character off.

Meet Jackson – Antony’s best friend, played by Marcus Scribner. Jackson is still trying to figure out his own place in life, but he’s loyal to Antony and acts as his confidante. He is the one person in the world that knows the secrets of the Melville family.

Terrell Goode, played by Trevor Jackson, is the son of Antony’s father’s nemesis. As I began diving back into the book, I ended up deciding to use some of his point of view, as well, and I opted to switch over to third person.

Meet Gwen Dolyn, played by Yara Shahidi – she is Terrell’s best friend. She supports him and acts as his confidante, but she’s also not afraid to put him in his place when he needs it. Her mother is an accomplished chef, who owns and cooks at the most sought after restaurant in their city.

Meet Terrell’s parents: Makeane and Alumni Goode, played by Lupita Nyong’o and Edi Gathegi.

Meet Antony’s parents: Finlay and Noemi Melville, played by Richard Rankin and Margareth Madè.

Stephen Lazarra, played by Matthew Gray Gubler, is Noemi’s brother and, therefore, Antony’s uncle. He drops into town every now and then to check on Antony and give his nephew some much needed attention.

Pretober – Voice

When you think of point of view, think of the “central intelligence” of your story – it is the thing that operates the eyes, ears, memory, and revelations, the thing through which your narrative is sifted and makes its progress. It is indicated by the pronouns that we use.

In first person, we use I/me. Generally, in this case, the protagonist is the first-person narrator. Any secondary characters (those that have a relationship with the protagonist and can relate to their experiences within the context of the story) or observers (witnesses that have limited or no participation in the story) are all filtered through the first-person narrator’s perspective.

In second person, the narrator is the reader. We do this by using second person pronouns – you/your. “You are constantly afraid that you will not be enough. The kingdom is fragile, fragile like an eggshell. A single strike and it will fall apart. Every battle, every dispute, you wonder: will this be it? Will this be the day you finally fail?” Second person is common in self-help books and anything giving directions. It is not common in fictional prose, but it does crop up from time to time. (If you’ve never read a second person story, “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid is a great example.)

Third person point of view uses the pronouns he/she/it/they. [NOTE: Most style guides now accept singular they.] With third person, we can get a more global view of what’s happening. The narrator and the main character are not the same person – they narrator is separate and therefore can comment on things that the main character may not know.

In addition to the above points of view, we want to consider which of the following makes the most sense for our story:

  • limited – a narrator that follows only one person throughout the story; this narrator can witness the actions of other characters, but has access only to the thoughts of the main character
  • multiple – follows more than one person throughout the story, allowing the story’s perspective to switch back and forth between individual stories/perspectives
  • omniscient – the narrator can jump from head to head; they can witness the actions of as well as access the thoughts of any character within the story
  • unreliable narrator – this is a narrator that cannot be trusted to accurately convey the story

The next thing to discuss is the difference between point of view and perspective. Point of view focuses on the type of narrator used to tell the story – who is telling the story. Perspective instead focuses on how this narrator perceives what’s happening within the story (i.e. the narrator’s world view). In other words, perspective is how and through what lens the story is told (i.e. their culture, heritage, physical traits, personal experiences, etc.). When you have multiple narrators, you should have multiple perspectives. As Robert Evans notes, “There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth. And no one is lying.” (Did you have a sibling or a close family member or family friend you grew up with? Ask them to run through a memory you share – let them tell you how they experienced it. Chances are, they will have a different version of the memory from than you will.)

Last, there is distance, which is the space between the narrator/main character and the event taking place – though it also refers to the space between the reader and the narrator/main character. Consider each of the following – the further down the list we go, the less the distance there is:

  • It was winter of the year 1853. A large man stepped out of a doorway.
    • Henry J. Warburton had never much cared for snowstorms.
    • Henry hated snowstorms.
    • Geez, he hated these damn snowstorms.
    • Snow under your collar, down inside your shoes, freezing and plugging up your miserable soul.

Sometimes, it can work to hold the reader at a distance – but you need to consider what you may lose by doing so. A reader wants to be engaged by what is going on – if they feel they are being held at arm’s length, they may start to question why. They may start to wonder what the narrator is holding back. If you wish to do this, you need to make sure that it will pay off in a satisfying way.

If you are interested in learning more about unreliable narrators, consider Gilman’s “The Yellow Wall-Paper,” Thurber’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty,” Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” or “The Tell-Tale Heart,” Nolan’s “Memento Mori,” or Palahniuk’s “Fight Club.” In Salinger’s “Catcher in the Rye,” Holden Caulfield admits he’s “the most terrific liar you ever saw.”

Pretober – Plotting

Kurt Vonnegut said, ‘I don’t plot my books rigidly, follow a preconceived structure. A novel mustn’t be a closed system – it’s a quest.’ Others, like the author of Room Emma Donoghue, prefer to have a guiding base structure. She notes that ‘Some writers can produce marvelous plots without planning it out, but I can’t. In particular I need to know the structure of a novel: what’s going to happen in each chapter and each scene.’

While some folks work best by letting their story romp around the page (like Vonnegut), and some are planners (like Donogue), all need to have an understanding of the structure of a story. I think my favorite way of looking at it was stated by Khaled Hosseini – “Writing fiction is the act of weaving a series of lies to arrive at a greater truth.” You can weave however you’d like – but to have something that is functional, you need to eventually make sure the structure is sturdy.

When it comes to NaNoWriMo, even if you are a pantser, it is a good idea to have a general idea of the plot and structure of your overall story. This doesn’t mean you can’t make changes as you go – but this can cut down on writer’s block quite a bit.

If you are a pantser, you might benefit from Freytag’s pyramid – it can help you lay out a general arc for your story without having to nail down all the details that might make you antsy as a pantser.

If you aren’t a pantser, something like the 15 Beats or the three-act structure might be more your speed. If you are new to writing novels, or you’re a planner who has never done NaNo before, the 15 Beats will give you the most structure in advance. This breaks the story down into specific pieces – sort of like a paint by numbers.

The three-act structure is somewhere in between Freytag’s and 15 Beats. It can be helpful to sit with the Three Act Structure template when you are planning out your story – fill in your plot points so that you know what you are writing to and what scenes you will need to develop. (This does not mean you can’t change the story as you write.) How detailed you want to be is up to you.

The “Acts” Structure:

  • Set Up –
    • Exposition: establishes main characters, their relationships, and their world
    • “the inciting incident” – later in the first act, a dynamic on-screen incident occurs – this is the catalyst that sets the protagonist’s adventure in motion
    • Plot Point One – sometimes, the inciting incident and plot point one happen in the same scene – think of plot point one as the spring board that launches your character into Act Two.
  • Confrontation –
    • Rising Action – typically depicts the protagonist’s attempt to resolve the problem initiated by the first turning point, only to find themselves in ever worsening situations. (Part of the reason protagonists seem unable to resolve their problems is because they do not yet have the skills to deal with the forces of antagonism that confront them.)
    • Midpoint – A significant event should take place here, usually involving something going horribly wrong.
    • Second plot point – Give them some time to reflect on the story’s conflict here. The aftermath of the Midpoint crisis will force the protagonist to pivot from being a “passenger” to a more proactive force to be reckoned with.
  • Resolution –
    • Pre-climax – this is where we get our first glimpse of the antagonist’s true strength, and it usually catches the main character off guard.
    • Climax – signifies the final moments of the story’s overarching conflict
    • Denouement – If the protagonist’s goal is not immediately obtained during the Climax, the denouement is where this should be achieved (or redefined, if their goal changed during Act Three). Along with this, the denouement should also:
      • fulfill any promises made to the reader (as Anton Chekhov notes, “If in Act One you have a pistol hanging on the wall, then it must fire in the last act.”),
      • tie up significant loose ends,
      • underscore the theme, and
      • release the tension built up during the climactic sequences of events.

Pretober – Setting

For some of you, when writing your stories, you may be doing more than just inventing characters and their lives. You may choose to take on creating a brand new, never before seen world for them to live in. The biggest piece of advice I can give you in this endeavor is just to make sure your characters treat the world as natural – as normal. As A.D. Jameson notes, “In world-building, there isn’t any supernatural, not really — just a different order of the natural.” The world just IS. And your characters don’t know any other way. Of course, it takes a bit more than this, but we’ll get to all that.

If you are choosing to create a brand-new world for your story, you will want to make sure that you get to know it as well as, if not better than, you know your characters. Remember, the setting, your world, is more than just streets and houses – it includes weather, local customs, and even what your characters do for a living. All of things these may have different rules from what we know in the reality of where we live – but they still must have rules. You get to decide what those rules are – and then you have to be vigilant in making sure the story follows those rules.

So for this week, if you are creating a fictional world for your NaNo story, I encourage you to answer the following questions as they pertain to your world (being as detailed as you can, but know that you can add as you write the actual story). These questions come from a previous professor of mine (I am unsure where they acquired them from):

First, think about basic infrastructure. How do they eat? What do they eat? Who takes away the garbage? Who deals with their bodily wastes? How do they get around? What do the majority of people do to survive? Consider water. Without water on our planet, there wouldn’t be life on Earth. What is water to your world? Maybe your characters don’t need water like we do – but they need something. Also, remember that you are not just creating a society – you are also creating an economy. People don’t oppress each other for fun (well, some do, but that’s a conversation for another time) — usually, systems of hierarchy and oppression have an economic component to them. What’s their money? How is it used? How is it divided?

Again, give your world concrete rules – and make sure you stick to them. Nature in this new world may not act like it does on our Earth – so what does it act like? If your world has two suns that are up at different times and give off different colors, yellow during the day and blue at night, then any time light is referenced at night, it’s got to have a blue hue. The way that it becomes believable to the reader is that the narrator treats it like it is a matter of fact and is consistent. So whether it’s a magical system or a societal mores, be sure that once you establish a convention, you stick to it.

Under the umbrella of rules, you have a few systems to consider – such as magic, religion (if it exists in your story), social interactions, politics, just to name a few. Most fantasy novels involve magic – and rules for this are important. You can create whatever system you’d like, but you need to have some sort of system. Maybe it’s based on numbers – or plants – or words – or something else entirely. Maybe your characters are born with magic – or they have to study for years to become proficient. Whatever you decide, it has to be consistent – characters cannot deviate from the system you have created.

There are many other systems to consider, as well – What is the power system like? (Meaning in-group/out-group power dynamics, but also literal power – how do they keep the lights on?) What does their government look like? Is there religion? Multiple religions? What about art and entertainment? Is this a brand new world? If not, what are significant events from its history? What technology exists in your world?

You may also want to consider creating a map of this new world (and including it with the story, if possible) so that the reader can easily follow along where events are taking place. This can help your reader stay oriented as your characters move around your world.

If you are creating a story in the world as we know it, or a historical version of it, you can ask/answer a lot of the same questions above. When it comes to historical fiction, however, you will want make sure you do the necessary research. The more research you can get out of the way now, the more you can then focus on writing in November. Immerse yourself now in that time period. Read books and watch movies that take place in those times/settings (nonfiction/documentaries are best). Go to a museum (if possible) and see artifacts from that time in person – make sure you take notes while you are there. Listen to music they would have listened to. Read archived newspapers (if available) that they would have read. If your story takes place after catalogs were in use, get hold of reprints of old catalogs. Old Montgomery Ward Catalogs will have descriptions of, and prices for, almost every personal item used by people of that time: hardware, books, stationery, toys, guns, toiletries, wallpaper, stoves, laundry equipment, saddles/harnesses. If you can, find an expert on that time/place.

Yes, use the internet – but be weary of the internet. There is a lot of flawed information out there. (Seriously – be cautious about information from places like Wikipedia.) Check everything you find against at least two sources. BUT don’t assume finding a piece of information in a lot of places means it’s factual – if a story or definition is repeated nearly verbatim in more than one source, there’s a good chance someone simply copied the information without verifying the accuracy. This is how a lot of bad information gets passed along and taken as “true.”

Regardless of the world you are using for your story, make sure you don’t let the setting overwhelm the story. The setting should be positioned behind the characters and events. It should add atmosphere and context – but don’t let it get in the way of the action. A little snippet here and there, in between the action and dialogue, is good. A three-page essay on how your artist protagonist prepares a canvas, with the characterization and events put on hold while you write it, will make your novel sound more like non-fiction. You want to make sure you do your research – but then keep most of it to yourself. Let it inform the story – don’t make it the story. For example, if it normally snows in December, you don’t need to detail the amount of snow they get – BUT your character will likely need to bundle up before they leave the house.

Remember, only leave stuff out because it doesn’t add anything to the story – not because you don’t know it or didn’t research it.

“If a writer of prose knows enough of what he is writing about, he may omit things that he knows, and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water. A writer who omits things because he does not know them only makes hollow places in his writing.” ~ Hemingway